It was probably Rolex that pioneered the use of a magnification lens on a watch’s crystal over the date to enhance the wearer’s ability to see the date. They were most likely to first to use this technique although it is unclear whether they invented the concept. Since Rolex starting using magnifier lenses, it has been a controversial watch feature. While most people don’t need the magnification lens (sometimes called a “cyclops”) to read the date, it is a nice addition to have when you want to know the date at a glance. And for some people, the date is just too small to be read without squinting.
However, this reaction from Rolex Sea Dweller James Cameron Replica is a tiny bit like Ferrari citing performance because of its use of Formula 1-style broadcasts over a three-pedal manual — yes, it’s quicker, but there a considerable proportion of this sports car buying public that believes we reached “quickly enough” years ago and could trade .03 off their car’s 0-60mph time whenever they could enjoy the feel of rowing their own gears.If Rolex really wished to make the most accurate watch in the same manner Ferrari wishes to create the maximum high performing automobile, would not the Sea-Dweller be thrown? Here in lies the great irony of Swiss watchmaking — they want to push performance and efficiency as far as you can, but not so much that they begin to play at a area where they are no more the experts — essentially until they begin sacrifice of any of their own traditions. If Ferrari, for example, was established in Geneva instead of Maranello, perhaps we’d see the brand new 812 Superfast using a six speed transmission and carburetors since “that’s the way the real car should be made.” The new Sea-Dweller includes a cyclops window, like it not.Ah, the bracelet, the one bit of any watch that is practically impervious to review from anyone. What’s there to say, really? The matter is that a modern marvel. Rolex has long been in the forefront of bracelet technology and indeed they have a full team of dedicated engineers, scientists and craftsman in Geneva that ensure what they create is the bar by which all other bracelets are measured. And if you didn’t know this already, Gay Freres, the maker of those unbelievable classic bracelets you see not only about Rolex watches but also others (such as classic Pateks) was acquired by Rolex some years back.
But also it is important to be aware that we got a new Sea-Dweller at 2014 — that is a hell of a brief run for a New Rolex Sea Dweller Replica mention when you recall that the very first Sea-Dweller was created from 1967 all of the way up until the 1980s. That can be Rolex, dammit, and things shouldn’t change too quickly — but they did. The thing is incredible, definitely. But we gained three millimeters in diameter from 2014 to 2017, and that means it’s no longer the same case size as the first. Further we’ve got a cyclops window onto the crystal which in case you’re a Sea-Dweller man, could be seen as something of a tragedy. Let’s go through the mention 126600 in detail, now that I have had a opportunity to spend a week sporting it.Forty three millimeters isn’t huge. But it is not small. It’s a whole 3mm bigger in diameter than the former generation Sea-Dweller, and well, all Sea-Dwellers that came prior to it. It stays 15mm thick (as quantified by myself; situation thickness is not a number Rolex stocks), and while my first response to this upsizing of a historical tool watch is, “gah, Rolex, why did you do this!?” Let’s consider the following.
Rolex put the magnifier lens on the Submariner (not Sea Dweller model) watches and the Datejust models (among other Rolex watch models). The placement of the date and magnifier was specifically chosen where it is, because if wearing a watch on your left hand, it was the first part of the watch that emerged from your sleeve, allowing quick reference to the date. Virtually all the Rolex clone models started to copy this design feature as it was an integral characteristic of the watches.
Magnifier lenses are not without their drawbacks. Many people do not like them for two reasons. First, is that they tend to attract scratches and blemishes. Being raised up from the otherwise flat crystal, the lens bump simply had more opportunity to rub against things. Second, lots of people simply do not like them from an aesthetic point of view. It is true that the magnifier lens can detract from the symmetry of a watch, and look odd while looking at the watch’s side profile.
In response to this, lots of people started to have magnifier lens removed through various types of customization, and watch makers ended up making models with and without the magnifier lenses. So consumers had two options, either go with a cleaner looks or have a date indicator that is easier to see.
The next step in the evolution of the date window magnifier was very clever, and almost seems obvious given the result. Watch makers took the magnifier lens and placed it upside down on the bottom of the crystal, as opposed to on the top. By reversing the lens, to magnify in this new direction, the same effect is achieved without the bump on top of the crystal. You can see this feature on some of the more expensive watches. A few notable ones are the Zenith Defy series, the Louis Vuitton Tambour line, and the Chopard Mille Miglia line of watch models. This upside down magnifier lens feature is not limited to these models, and should be found on a number of newer watches. As time goes on, these new types of lenses are sure to appear on less expensive models.
To achieve this upside down lens effect, there must be enough clearance between the face of the watch, and the crystal. With the trend in watches being larger in size, this is often not an issue, and the upside down lens is actually a bit smaller than would be needed on top of the crystal. Needless to say, this feature is very clever, and works wonderfully in providing the best of both worlds to those of us who want a clean looking watch that is visually convenient.
It Ought to Be noted that the Sea-Dweller did come following the Deep-Sea Particular, the watch clamped to the exterior of the Trieste when it descended to the bottom of the Challenger Deep. But that opinion was enormous — completely unwearable — and of course, it was not even really designed to be worn at the first place. The same could be said for another experimental opinion made by Rolex in 2012, the Deepsea Challenge, a monster 51mm mega-dive watch that James Cameron strapped to the exterior of his vessel when he uttered the historical 1960 dip. The Sea-Dweller wasn’t invented as a one-time use tool, or even a prototype from which other technology could be taken — it had been made for the most serious sailors on earth, and meant to be worn daily, over a very long period of time.As said, the link between outer space and “inner space,” (a term that was coined by the Eisenhower administration after the successful dives of Trieste) was an actual one. Scott Carpenter, one of those original seven Mercury astronauts and the pilot of the second manned orbital flight by an American, in Aurora 7, took leave from NASA in 1965 to take part in the U.S. Navy’s “Man-in-the-Sea” Project known as SEALAB. As a team leader for SEALAB II off the coast of La Jolla, California in the summer of 1965, Carpenter and his team members spent 30 days living and working on the sea floor conducting research from a seafloor habitat at 205 feet underwater. With Carpenter was Bob Barth, who was the only guy to take part in the 3 different SEALAB missions. His Submariner reference 5512 was offered for sale a couple of years ago although the seller made no mention of just how significant this Submariner and its owner were for the development of this Sea-Dweller.
Check out Zenith Defy, Chopard Mille Miglia, and Rolex Sea Dweller 11660 Replica watches on eBay here.